What a stranger can regenerate.

Claimed funnel 7.9M→1.87M→427k→5371→931; dielectric 1.5–1.9; 27 viable pairs

control: The siloxane screen exits 1 when its required sibling Pareto CSV is absent.

basis: estimate: imported/3prok/00_TOP3_IDEAS_RANKED.md and cooling-fluid-10/docs/PFAS_FREE_COOLING_OPTIMUM.md. Original funnel inputs/scripts are not available here. The pair screen requires an absent external CSV. Electronic polarizability agreement does not establish static liquid permittivity. The claimed $12.5B supply gap misuses a settlement amount.

FoM4 4.06×; delta-sigma 27.57 mN/m; epsilon estimate 8.28; viscosity estimate 0.319 mPa·s

python3 -B -c 'import runpy;m=runpy.run_path("cooling-fluid-10/scripts/extend_fom_top10.py");p="GBL";b=m["blend_properties"]("Pentane",p);print(m["fom4"](m["load_canonical_sigma"]()["Pentane+"+p]["sigma"],p,b));print("epsilon",round(b["epsilon"],2),"mu",round(b["mu_mPas"],3))'

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/corrected_fom_nist.json · 18919 B · sha256 8b778b39b6d365ad53264af4b5a6fc9ff990a57e00c7bae5361dedfee4895361

control: Shared FoM input-perturbation control passes; constant-sigma regression control returns zero slope.

basis: computational estimate: canonical sigma plus literature-property mixing. The historical seven-member pool and temperature fit also reproduce as detailed below. Neither establishes miscibility, actual self-pumping or direct-immersion qualification.

epsilon estimate 2.05; FoM4 3.50×; delta-sigma 11.25 mN/m

python3 -B -c 'import runpy;m=runpy.run_path("cooling-fluid-10/scripts/extend_fom_top10.py");p="DMC";b=m["blend_properties"]("Pentane",p);print(m["fom4"](m["load_canonical_sigma"]()["Pentane+"+p]["sigma"],p,b));print("epsilon",round(b["epsilon"],2),"mu",round(b["mu_mPas"],3))'

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/corrected_fom_nist.json · 18919 B · sha256 8b778b39b6d365ad53264af4b5a6fc9ff990a57e00c7bae5361dedfee4895361

control: sigma=20.00 produces FoM4=3.24. Aromaticity correction leaves this separate dielectric calculation unchanged.

basis: literature-derived ideal mixing estimate, not measured epsilon or electrical safety. Source constants and molecular weights are in scripts/extend_fom_top10.py. Seven stored replicas do not all regenerate from committed raw data. Contact angle 26 degrees is a literature fallback.

357.6 W/cm²; 90% interval 203.7–556.1; P(top-1) approximately 0.79

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 /opt/homebrew/bin/python3.11 -B cooling-fluid-10/scripts/phaseB/harden_survivors.py

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/phaseB/hardened_system_ranking.json · 3973 B · sha256 51c3a2ecfac450c4d37c5588ddab74513350e1d7d66603142487fc329216849f

control: Zero-Marangoni versus normal same-stream control gives 111.5 versus 184.3 W/cm² for the Pentane+DMC reference.

basis: estimate: seeded Monte Carlo over literature properties, Zuber CHF and assumed enhancement multipliers. Exact stored P(top-1)=0.786 also regenerated. Nonflammability and actual CHF are unmeasured. The high-methanol 80:20 reference is not the 5:95 flagship composition.

Modeled system CHF 228.8 W/cm²; claimed epsilon approximately 2.0 is rejected

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 /opt/homebrew/bin/python3.11 -B cooling-fluid-10/scripts/phaseB/harden_survivors.py

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/phaseB/hardened_system_ranking.json · 3973 B · sha256 51c3a2ecfac450c4d37c5588ddab74513350e1d7d66603142487fc329216849f
• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/md_properties_raw.json · 6654 B · sha256 5c316810d72769f6535e17837f7258c1d8f4c9272914e77922f24bd69204406a

control: VC aromaticity control changes its group assignment from 2.0 to 5.0; repaired blend lookup is 2.9.

basis: estimate: the command reproduces CHF, not a valid dielectric constant. Exact P(top-1)=0.165 regenerated. The repaired lookup conflicts with recorded MD epsilon=12.827; physical epsilon remains unresolved. Best, nonflammable and first-ever are not established.

Claimed R²>0.75 does not reproduce

• cooling-fluid-10/docs/CROSS_VALIDATION_CONSOLIDATED_2026-04-19.md · 7579 B · sha256 e7f4c94ffa4e6a3ea3886ae0adeb95f2a7504369cf724828d712903511fe3a7d

control: Missing-committed-input test control reproduces 15 failures; dictionary-anchor tests are not independent predictive validation.

basis: estimate: BEST_IDEAS.md and imported discovery-engine narrative. Committed validation documentation instead reports RF R²=0.421 and Chemprop retrain R²=0.279. Functioning individual stages do not establish the claimed end-to-end predictive performance.

Canonical FoM4 3.83×; delta-sigma 24.88 mN/m; epsilon estimate 11.31

python3 -B -c 'import runpy;m=runpy.run_path("cooling-fluid-10/scripts/extend_fom_top10.py");p="PC";b=m["blend_properties"]("Pentane",p);print(m["fom4"](m["load_canonical_sigma"]()["Pentane+"+p]["sigma"],p,b));print("epsilon",round(b["epsilon"],2),"mu",round(b["mu_mPas"],3))'

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/corrected_fom_nist.json · 18919 B · sha256 8b778b39b6d365ad53264af4b5a6fc9ff990a57e00c7bae5361dedfee4895361

control: Shared FoM perturbation control; Hansen calculation is a miscibility-risk screen rather than proof of one phase.

basis: computational/literature estimate. Current pooled FoM is 3.70. FDA-GRAS wording does not establish safety or authorization of this coolant formulation and use. Direct-immersion suitability remains unverified.

Internal dossier scores A-06=25; S-01=A-05=S-07=23

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 /opt/homebrew/bin/python3.11 -B -c 'import json;from pathlib import Path;score=lambda s:2*s["N"]+sum(s[k] for k in ("U","C","P","F"));print("CONTROL zero",score(dict.fromkeys(("N","U","C","P","F"),0)));base=Path("cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/dossiers")
for i in ("A-06","S-01","A-05","S-07","C-15"):
 p=base/(i+".json");d=json.loads(p.read_text());print(i,score(d["score"]),str(p))'

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/dossiers/A-06.json · 5061 B · sha256 de72181275434f377798347e5e93db77e4fd6004d813afa22be55fb131242b45
• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/dossiers/S-01.json · 6456 B · sha256 e9e2109bd3dbe7b8779d80cc9de56b8989052bbb998c3dcce0f782542b88cbf6
• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/dossiers/A-05.json · 5433 B · sha256 6274f3593de36ac260e8837ada5398faa8d50078365c2d6ae765f6226c7c884a
• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/dossiers/S-07.json · 6497 B · sha256 f6552098a454f9a279b1bc9d14449a691ab86393d0733b9029d0026a0a3464b9

control: Zero scoring inputs return zero. Closed-loop fractionation conservation control fails.

basis: estimate: weighted subjective dossier axes, not demonstrated control-system performance. FTO LOW and counsel_ready are stored internal labels. The existing fractionation simulation cannot support operating-stability claims.

Claimed static epsilon approximately 2.4; recorded single-seed sigma 22.27 mN/m

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/pfas_optimum/siloxane_md_sigma.json · 792 B · sha256 23a5ad4769570345a95b68649da44d2af3dba05ec3640ca10368d3b31e2c31d1

control: Upstream screen fails on missing sibling Pareto CSV; its siloxane static epsilon is a class constant.

basis: estimate: CLASS_STATIC_EPS in scripts/pfas_optimum/siloxane_marangoni_screen.py and docs/PFAS_FREE_COOLING_OPTIMUM.md. Raw candidate-specific dielectric and surface-tension regeneration are not established. The borrowed CoolProp 0.12% claim in imported/david/IDEA_RANKING.md does not validate this molecule.

BEST_IDEAS claims pooled FoM4 3.92×; current computation gives 3.81×

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/multi_pair_uq_pool.json · 7260 B · sha256 cf5892965f8f69d1e56fd2c2e7f905de9511bf3749ef5cdbde3a410e6422f5d3
• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/corrected_fom_nist.json · 18919 B · sha256 8b778b39b6d365ad53264af4b5a6fc9ff990a57e00c7bae5361dedfee4895361

control: Constant-sigma temperature-fit control returns zero slope.

basis: estimate: the original 3.92×/n=5 claim is stale and has no current reproduction command. Current seven-member pool sigma=15.058 yields 3.81×. Separately, committed raw temperature-sweep XVGs reproduce slope=-0.1771395 and R²=0.965958 through scripts/propagate_g3_dmf_sigmaT.py.

Internal C-15 score 23/30; pure-fuel boiling-window estimates reproduce

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 /opt/homebrew/bin/python3.11 -B -c 'import json;from pathlib import Path;score=lambda s:2*s["N"]+sum(s[k] for k in ("U","C","P","F"));print("CONTROL zero",score(dict.fromkeys(("N","U","C","P","F"),0)));base=Path("cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/dossiers")
for i in ("A-06","S-01","A-05","S-07","C-15"):
 p=base/(i+".json");d=json.loads(p.read_text());print(i,score(d["score"]),str(p))'

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/dossiers/C-15.json · 5519 B · sha256 2ddd3aa97b342f93dec37ecba2c5f1449b5b7106f968a8e61e5f4bc798c36231
• cooling-fluid-10/docs/PRESSURE_TUNED_OPTIMA.md · 1798 B · sha256 df8bf607f0123c3c57f4110201746d79b2824d2b7ad4fbf50db20161f5903e9e

control: Pressure calculation returns its reference boiling point at one atmosphere.

basis: estimate: score arithmetic and pure-component pressure calculations. This does not regenerate mixture VLE, a composition optimum, or retargeting of any arbitrary blend.

Pooled FoM4 3.66×; epsilon estimate 3.96

python3 -B -c 'import runpy;m=runpy.run_path("cooling-fluid-10/scripts/extend_fom_top10.py");p="Cyclohexanone";print(m["fom4"](m["load_uq_pool"]()["Pentane+"+p]["pool_mean_mNm"],p,m["blend_properties"]("Pentane",p)));print("epsilon",round(m["blend_properties"]("Pentane",p)["epsilon"],2))'

• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/corrected_fom_nist.json · 18919 B · sha256 8b778b39b6d365ad53264af4b5a6fc9ff990a57e00c7bae5361dedfee4895361
• cooling-fluid-10/data/processed/multi_pair_uq_pool.json · 7260 B · sha256 cf5892965f8f69d1e56fd2c2e7f905de9511bf3749ef5cdbde3a410e6422f5d3

control: Shared FoM perturbation control; independent Hansen arithmetic tests pass.

basis: computational/literature estimate. The separate Ra=7.64 claim belongs to cyclopentane+cyclohexanone, not pentane+cyclohexanone. Do not transfer its miscibility classification.

No regenerated coolant-performance figure; BEST_IDEAS score 16 is subjective

control: Empty enhancement list incorrectly selects the default enhanced stack.

basis: literature/estimate: enhancement_stack.py cites the foam, biphilic, nanoparticle and acoustic enhancement literature. Multipliers combine literature assumptions with tuned coupling; they are not measured FluxZero performance.

No microgravity-specific performance figure; BEST_IDEAS score 12 is subjective

basis: estimate/hypothesis: BEST_IDEAS.md and cooling-fluid-10/scripts/lockspace/build_design_space.py, where the microgravity segment is unscored. No microgravity-specific validating simulation was established.